AirwaySim
Online Airline Management Simulation
Login
Username
Password
 
or login using:
 
My Account
Username:
E-mail:
Edit account
» Achievements
» Logout
Game Credits
Credit balance: 0 Cr
Buy credits
» Credit history
» Credits FAQ

Author Topic: we need more demand seats per routes...  (Read 295 times)

Offline weshallfly

  • Members
  • Posts: 3

The person who likes this post:
we need more demand seats per routes...
« on: February 14, 2019, 01:57:11 AM »
especially smaller airports...so low demand....please fix this so we can make proper revenue...we dont want to be in the most popular  airports but the scale is so big between demands

Offline Zobelle

  • Members
  • Posts: 1760
Re: we need more demand seats per routes...
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2019, 02:38:39 AM »
This is true, but one must scale their operation for their airport choice or slightly over scale with a singular fleet type to lessen overhead.

Offline gazzz0x2z

  • Members
  • Posts: 3592
Re: we need more demand seats per routes...
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2019, 07:25:16 AM »
especially smaller airports...so low demand....please fix this so we can make proper revenue...we dont want to be in the most popular  airports but the scale is so big between demands

Well, that's realistic, IMHO. I'd even say it's already better than reality. Currently playing in MPL, with far more flights than in the real world. I also had bases in remote areas like Visby or Poznan, and could fill them an unrealistic way. If Visby has as much demand as Heathrow, what is the point of playing in Heathrow?

Offline Zobelle

  • Members
  • Posts: 1760
Re: we need more demand seats per routes...
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2019, 08:33:04 AM »
Well, that's realistic, IMHO. I'd even say it's already better than reality. Currently playing in MPL, with far more flights than in the real world. I also had bases in remote areas like Visby or Poznan, and could fill them an unrealistic way. If Visby has as much demand as Heathrow, what is the point of playing in Heathrow?

Heathrow has more competition.

Offline gazzz0x2z

  • Members
  • Posts: 3592

The person who likes this post:
Re: we need more demand seats per routes...
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2019, 08:51:48 AM »
Heathrow has more competition.

which is natural : where there is demand, there is competition. Noone folllowed me in Visby. Guess why? Increase Visby's demand, and you'll have s***loads of opponents there.

Offline weshallfly

  • Members
  • Posts: 3

The 2 people who like this post:
Re: we need more demand seats per routes...
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2019, 01:46:06 PM »
you could at least put a mode that increase demands over time and years through marketing..

Offline Talentz

  • Members
  • Posts: 982

The person who likes this post:
Re: we need more demand seats per routes...
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2019, 08:54:41 PM »
you could at least put a mode that increase demands over time and years through marketing..

There is a new system under the works called City-based demand that will help your cause. That said, don't expect miracles.


Talentz
Co-founder and Managing member of: The Star Alliance Groupô - A beta era, multi-brand alliance.

Offline wilian.souza2

  • Members
  • Posts: 876

The 4 people who like this post:
Re: we need more demand seats per routes...
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2019, 12:50:30 AM »
I think the pax demand generator should have the ability to shift demand among days to allow operations on low demand routes in less times a week. For example, open a route with an average of 7 pax/day (49 pax/week) and, over time, part of the weekly demand shifts to the day you're flying so that you can fill like 25-30 seats in that route. The same thing could be applied for cargo, too.

Offline Zobelle

  • Members
  • Posts: 1760

The person who likes this post:
Re: we need more demand seats per routes...
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2019, 01:21:02 AM »
I think the pax demand generator should have the ability to shift demand among days to allow operations on low demand routes in less times a week. For example, open a route with an average of 7 pax/day (49 pax/week) and, over time, part of the weekly demand shifts to the day you're flying so that you can fill like 25-30 seats in that route. The same thing could be applied for cargo, too.

Yes, itíd be nice to dedicate a once or twice weekly service to low demand LH destinations with 50-70 daily pax demand that can shift to that once weekly frequency and fill a plane on that once weekly flight. It would also require a recalculation to RI of course to maintain desirability.

 

WARNING! This website is not compatible with the old version of Internet Explorer you are using.

If you are using the latest version please turn OFF the compatibility mode.