Better Range Graphs

[swiftus27]

I find the current graphs to be hard to read and understand.  Is there a better way to see what pax loads and ranges will be?   

For instance, I want to squeeze 7700nm out of an A342 but am not sure how many seats I need to take away without having to set up a dummy flight just to see. 

Is there any way we can make the existing framework easier?  I cant understand the current scale of the graph.

[Maarten Otto]

+1

[tim]

+1 how about to make them clickable that we could choose some point on graph and see params.

[ACDennison]

I second the above...

A potential 'quick fix' in the inerim would be to sort out the rang (X-axis/horizontal).  By using fixed 300nm intervals, the gridlines are all but useless, as the values and lines don't line up at all.  As it is, the vertical Y-axis for Pax or Payload doesn't use fixed intervals, it varies the intervals but correctlly aligns the gridlines and is far easier to read.   Can we change the X-axis to behave like the Y-axis...?