If your name is on this list, your first in line for 30 player private game!!!!

[kingskipster]

Sweeet!!!

[cashacasha]

Sweet is right

[jagalubnan]

Please remove my name, as well. I never said that I wanted to join.

[toyotaboy95]

I have just been informed that the 30 player game request has been approved by Sami. If your name is on this list you have reservations. The game will cost 15 credits per player. Game could start as early as tomorrow. Thanks to all that have shown support in smaller games.If you would like to have your name added please send me a PM. Thanks

masoniclight
Unbornio
toyotaboy95
Runner
Brockster
alec25283
Robertdibble
Mathewn50
swiftus27
ukatlantic
Kontio
blair21088
Meraki
Skylink
Jagalubnan
tacsniper
kingskipster
digifreak
737Capt
elleana
Arvidsson410
Clc000

Private game, 30-40 players.
* Two continents  North America & Europe
* All aircraft models for the era
* 1988-2008
* 20 min game days
* Bankruptcy rule, once
* Start-up cash $6mil,
* 15 Credits per member, at least 30 members must join, using their own credits.

I won't join if it's only Europe and North America. Pls remove me THX. i'd rather play a public world in this case.

[lknd]

Can I join?

[JJP]

I will join.  Do we know if any of the current updates being worked on will be implemented?  Just curious.

[JJP]

May I make a game start suggestion?  Don't hate on me; I'm just throwing it out there.

With so few players playing, wouldn't it be nice if we did not have initial game "fights"? 

I am thinking we could initially all make a list of at least our top 10 home base airports.  If you're the only one who has your #1 pick, you get that airport.  If several people have the same top pick, we can talk it out (maybe some will not mind going to 2nd, 3rd, or 4th pick).  If 2 or more people want the same home base, maybe "deals" can be worked out, something like: "I would like exclusive rights to x-y route and x-z route.  You can have exclusive rights to x-a and x-b routes." 

That way we could maybe avoid initial game conflicts, scrambling, and fierce competition.

What do you think?   

[masoniclight]

I second that motion!

[Kontio]

I think we should avoid hubbing at the same airports but I would not want any other deals limiting competition.

[Brockster]

I agree with JJP. However, maybe it would be ok to have two airlines at the largest airports like Atlanta, Heathrow or Chicago? I don't know, I guess it doesn't matter too much.

[lknd]

I agree with JJP. However, maybe it would be ok to have two airlines at the largest airports like Atlanta, Heathrow or Chicago? I don't know, I guess it doesn't matter too much.

Yes, I agree with you. I think, it would be ok to have two airlines at the largest-of the-largest airports, but no more - we have enough large airports that 30 players can join

[JJP]

Yes, I agree with you. I think, it would be ok to have two airlines at the largest-of the-largest airports, but no more - we have enough large airports that 30 players can join

2 at the largest airports should be perfectly fine.

[masoniclight]

I claim General Mitchell Airport (Milwaukee, Wisconsin)

[Kontio]

My first choice is Madrid.

[blair21088]

7 more! lets do this thing.

[lknd]

I`d like to choose Frankfurt EDDF as my first home base 
If there are anybody, who wants to start in FRA too - let me know please

[Brockster]

My choice is LAX as my home base. If anyone else wants to hub there too let me know as well. 

EDIT: I'll add my next top 4 choices:

2nd: Chicago ORD
3rd: Dallas DFW
4th: Amsterdam
5th: London LHR

[blair21088]

I don't think we really need to call airports with only 30 players

[Runner]

If we're doing this: IAD is the one for me!

@ Masoniclight: this game will only have 30-50 players in it. Why not chose a bigger base?

[swiftus27]

There should be no "Calling" of airports. 

Everyone should be on their own like in each game.  The only other fair way is to have a lottery of sorts.