aircraft comparison

[sergio]

hello!

on one forum people are comparing 767-300-ER and IL-96-300, with words: Boeing takes 200 pax and uses 6 tonns fuel, IL, takes 300 pax and 15 tonns of cargo and uses 7 tonns. And every hour of IL is 1000 USD cheaper than 767-300-ER.

I want to see these nice descriptions of aircraft (ABCDc check costs, pax configurations (Y,B,F), tonns versus distance, airport dues etc.) and compare them like in the game, however i must have active game. i dont want to waste my credits now, because my brain in engaged with another online game at the moment. so where can i find it?

because i think Boeing is better, but i dont have figures to compare and prove it, and i think it is incorrct to compare with ER.

wbrgds

[sergio]

i mean - if i play Airway sim, than after some time it take 4 hours a day finding new routes, writing it down, only then i will order new acfs ))))
and i keep thinking of it when going to sleep and after waking up. so - i dont want to enter world game just to see the characteristcis of acf and then leave the game.
and far not everything is in wikipedia.

[Sami]

The AWS aircraft data is not available anywhere outside the game worlds.

[sergio]

ok, thank you!

[sergio]

can anybody with long experience in the game and/or experience of exploitation of real life acf comment the first post in this topic?
p.s. or shall i leave to off-topic? )))

[LemonButt]

can anybody with long experience in the game and/or experience of exploitation of real life acf comment the first post in this topic?
p.s. or shall i leave to off-topic? )))

Here you go.  The 767 is far superior.

[pascaly]

Ooooh that's a nice looking spreadsheet you've got there Lemon.....very nice.....

[chiveicrook]

On a side note, practically every Russian plane in AWS from IL-62 onwards has terribly inaccurate fuel consumption data with possible exception of the newer models (SSJ etc.)

[Curse]

@ chiveicrook

Feel free to provide correct data from a reliable source to sami so he can fix that.