Started by Sami, August 12, 2015, 06:31:21 PM
Quote from: alex_king92 on September 17, 2015, 08:30:06 AMI agree, times are already long, but look at the game only: if I operate a pax only flight I will earn less than a company which operates pax +cargo and has an "extra" earning. So I think it's a good incentive to pax carriers and offers more strategic possibilities.
Quote from: alex_king92 on September 17, 2015, 05:32:03 PMThink about low cost carriers which doesn't carry cargo and turn they planes in 20/25 min. No ground handling costs for loading cargo. They really save time and money in this.
Quote from: alex_king92 on September 17, 2015, 08:26:23 PMThere is nothing you can't realize. Mine was just a suggestion, you don't understand this or you get satisfaction in gainsaying?
Quote from: alex_king92 on September 18, 2015, 05:37:48 PMIt seems you've lost the point of my suggestion, please, read again my previous post. I'm not against current turnaround times, and as I can see, you are agree with me when you speak about doubling loading crew. I have written enough about this thread.CheersAlex
Quote from: pdxpilot06 on September 26, 2015, 07:42:40 AMI noticed that the orientation of the values for daily supply and demand on the Estimated daily passenger demand (passengers / day) chart has been changed from the normal horizontal format. The new format is extremely hard to read and one has to twist their neck to read the number above each bar on the chart.Any chance the format can be changed back to improve readability?
Quote from: Jona L. on September 26, 2015, 12:13:48 PMFormat has been changed to accommodate the longer numbers for cargo demands. Change was intentional. Likely not to be reverted.