Quick beta available

[JumboShrimp]

Creating route A-T-B-A, I end up with A-T-B-A (good)
Creating route A-B-T-A, I end up with A-T-B-A (bad)

Route A-B is beyond the rang of the full load, so it is limiting pax
Route A-T-B is not limiting pax (good)
Route B-A is limiting pax (good)

B-A takes over 1 hour longer to fly than A-B.  So max pax load on A-B should be more than B-A.  They are equal (Not so good).

[JumboShrimp]

Interesting observation:

Tab 1 open in MT6
Tab 2 open in MT6

I change game in Tab 2 to Test Server
When I perform actions in Tab 2, I am on Test server
When I perform actions in Tab 1, I am in MT6

When I open a new Tab 3 from Tab 2 (Test Server), Tab 3 is in Test Server
When I open a new Tab 4 from Tab 1 (MT6), Tab 4 is in Test Server.  New tab takes the last server logged into setting.

This is on IE9.

[Sami]

Interesting observation:

You cannot have multiple worlds open at the same time in same browser, different tabs or no.

[cab]

Hi Sami

I know this was raised earlier by Jumboshrimp but can't see latest on it looking back thru posts.
Loading... on confirming Open Route is still happening. Route is created okay and can be scheduled. Running with IE8.

[terminalwander]

Try to schedule a flight from KIAD (IAD) to MWCB (CYB) with a 738.  The runway is 1829 M at CYB and my aircraft needs 1850M at MTOW.  It says the the aircraft can't fly this route but it should be a restricted to less PAX not all out can't do.  

Maybe I am missing something.

[Dutch]

Demand between those cities is 10pax p/d, and since you are limited to operate twice the demand it is not possible with a 738 (I honestly don't see the point of opening up that route  )

[Sami]

Demand between those cities is 10pax p/d ... (I honestly don't see the point of opening up that route )

Well that's not the point at all in this test world. (to make profits or similar)

Try to schedule a flight from KIAD (IAD) to MWCB (CYB) with a 738.  The runway is 1829 M at CYB and my aircraft needs 1850M at MTOW.  It says the the aircraft can't fly this route but it should be a restricted to less PAX not all out can't do.  

You cannot fly 737 to that airport at all (due to size), it's not even listed there if you check again...

[terminalwander]

You cannot fly 737 to that airport at all (due to size), it's not even listed there if you check again...

[/quote]
My bad.  I forget a 737 is a large aircraft.    I will Keep looking.

Any Ideas on the Marketing problem?

[psw231]

  Airport slots seem to be very random at the current date, KJFK-29, KMSP-43, KORD-69, not important to me but does not look acurate for the current date.
Also having the same problem with IE8 with non stop loading icon upon route confirmation, works fine on the same PC with Safari.

[alexgv1]

  Airport slots seem to be very random at the current date, KJFK-29, KMSP-43, KORD-69, not important to me but does not look acurate for the current date.

Remember slots start at 50% and grow to 200% of real world values during the first 5(?) years in AWS so perhaps this is why it looks strange to you.

[psw231]

 Anti monopoly warnong for PSW Airways on the KJFK-KIAH route, I am running 4/321 with 185 seats each=740 seats total, demand shows up for me at 514-679, also when in route planning screen none of my flights are listed at the bottom of the page although there are stats in route management for this route.

[Sami]

Creating route A-T-B-A, I end up with A-T-B-A (good)
Creating route A-B-T-A, I end up with A-T-B-A (bad)

Did you use the direct URL (probably the cause) or the airport selector?

Anti monopoly warnong for PSW Airways on the KJFK-KIAH route, I am running 4/321 with 185 seats each=740 seats total, demand shows up for me at 514-679, also when in route planning screen none of my flights are listed at the bottom of the page although there are stats in route management for this route.

The warnings are correct, and have not changed, so check again pls.

[JumboShrimp]

Did you use the direct URL (probably the cause) or the airport selector?

I used the user interface.  I created the routes both ways, but in both cases I ended up with A-T-B-A route.  I did not try with direct URLs.

[Sami]

yes, ok, saw it too now.

Remainder of reported bugs will be fixed hopefully tomorrow and the last couple of missing features will be added on monday by latest.

[JumboShrimp]

yes, ok, saw it too now.

Remainder of reported bugs will be fixed hopefully tomorrow and the last couple of missing features will be added on monday by latest.

Is the different pax load based on flight time going to be part of this?  I think it probably would make sense, since with more flexible tech stops, players could fine tune their routes to maximize efficiency.

Also, there were some issues of how flights with tech stops going across the date line were reported:
https://www.airwaysim.com/forum/index.php/topic,34238.0.html

[psw231]

Anti monopoly warnong for PSW Airways on the KJFK-KIAH route, I am running 4/321 with 185 seats each=740 seats total, demand shows up for me at 514-679, also when in route planning screen none of my flights are listed at the bottom of the page although there are stats in route management for this route.

Ignore this post as flown route was KJFK-KHOU which explains all of the above.

[Ilyushin]

Are alliances not activated in this game?

[slither360]

Are alliances not activated in this game?

no

[Sami]

- from airport selection, list, open in new tab does not work.  The URL on the check icon to select the route has only Games/Routes not a specific Games/Routes/ABC/XYZ
- Confirm on editing/creating a route still has the endless hourglass.  The route does created, but the next screen is never returned...
- I don't know if this was planned to fix, but my route LAX FCO, that is pax limited by weight, has both legs of the trip the same pax capacity.  Even though one leg is 1 hour longer than the other.

1) url bug fixed

2) should be ok now

3) not planned, would be a bit complicated.

Creating route A-T-B-A, I end up with A-T-B-A (good)
Creating route A-B-T-A, I end up with A-T-B-A (bad)

fixed.



..so seems to be the last of bugs mentioned in this thread now.

[L1011fan]

Just have noticed this morning (PST) that while planning routes the destination aerodrome is taking a lot longer to load than I've ever seen before. Everything else is quick as usual except for that.