AirwaySim

General forums => General forum => Topic started by: swiftus27 on April 18, 2009, 02:00:34 PM

Title: Airplane Missing From Game
Post by: swiftus27 on April 18, 2009, 02:00:34 PM
Lockheed Constellation:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Constellation


(Perhaps this can be a continuing thread???)
Title: Re: Airplane Missing From Game
Post by: d2031k on April 18, 2009, 02:15:21 PM
It says in your link:

'The last scheduled passenger flight of a four-engined piston-engined airliner in the United States was made by a TWA L749 on May 11, 1967 from Philadelphia to Kansas City, MO' (Wikipedia)

This game doesn't start until 1974, so maybe Sami deemed them to be too old for use.

Nice idea for a thread though :)
Title: Re: Airplane Missing From Game
Post by: Sami on April 18, 2009, 02:15:51 PM
Some planes are missing still, I know. But like mentioned the Connie is too old for these anyway.
Title: Re: Airplane Missing From Game
Post by: Flightman on April 19, 2009, 09:16:15 PM
I would like to have Mitsubishi MU-2 to the game!
Title: Re: Airplane Missing From Game
Post by: ekaneti on April 19, 2009, 09:27:14 PM
Youll never make any $$ with the MU-2. I think it seats 6.

Some planes arent appropriate for airlines but are good business or executive aircraft. MU-2 would be one
Title: Re: Airplane Missing From Game
Post by: elleana on April 20, 2009, 03:16:04 AM
And all the Lears and Gulfstreams of the world...
Title: Re: Airplane Missing From Game
Post by: Sami on April 20, 2009, 07:55:47 AM
Business jets will not be included.

But some small turboprops / pistons like Cessna 400 series will be added as they have been used, and are used still today, with some air taxi / very thin commuter routes.
Title: Re: Airplane Missing From Game
Post by: Pilot Oatmeal on January 14, 2011, 11:24:48 PM
My dad is an mu-2 pilot, the long body can sit 8 and is a very decent aircraft with good performance and range.  The solitaire is a better performance but only sits 6.  I would LOVE this edition to airwaysim for short air-taxi!!! definately should be added