AirwaySim

General forums => General forum => Topic started by: AHToronto on December 31, 2007, 06:07:57 PM

Title: planes thought should be in AirwaySim...
Post by: AHToronto on December 31, 2007, 06:07:57 PM
you should add the:


Airbus

for these ones just below(A350...),scroll down and when you are finished, click on "A350-900" or "A350-1000" and do the same as "A350-800"
A350-800,900,1000 http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/a350/a350-800/specifications.html (http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/a350/a350-800/specifications.html)

A340-300 http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/a330a340/a340-300/specifications.html (http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/a330a340/a340-300/specifications.html)

-500 http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/a330a340/a340-500/specifications.html (http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/a330a340/a340-500/specifications.html)

-600 http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/a330a340/a340-600/specifications.html (http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/a330a340/a340-600/specifications.html)

A380 http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/a380/a380/specifications.html (http://www.airbus.com/en/aircraftfamilies/a380/a380/specifications.html)


Bombardier

CRJ-1000(coming in 2009) http://www.bombardier.com/CRJ/en/NextGen/index.html (http://www.bombardier.com/CRJ/en/NextGen/index.html)

for the one below(CRJ-705...), just simply scroll down.
CRJ-705 http://www.crj.bombardier.com/CRJ/en/specifications.jsp?langId=en&crjId=705 (http://www.crj.bombardier.com/CRJ/en/specifications.jsp?langId=en&crjId=705)

for the C-110 and 130, go to "commercial aircraft" and click on the "Bombardier CSeries", move the mouse over "110" or "130" and click on "Aircraft specifications" and scroll down.
C-110 http://www.bombardier.com/index.jsp?id=3_0&lang=en&file=/en/3_0/3_0.jsp (http://www.bombardier.com/index.jsp?id=3_0&lang=en&file=/en/3_0/3_0.jsp)

C-130 http://www.bombardier.com/index.jsp?id=3_0&lang=en&file=/en/3_0/3_0.jsp (http://www.bombardier.com/index.jsp?id=3_0&lang=en&file=/en/3_0/3_0.jsp)


Douglas

DC-8 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_DC-8#Specifications (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_DC-8#Specifications)


McDonnell Douglas

MD-95
http://wapedia.mobi/en/Boeing_717#4. (http://wapedia.mobi/en/Boeing_717#4.)


ACAC

ARJ21-700 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACAC_ARJ21#Specifications_.28ARJ21-700.29 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACAC_ARJ21#Specifications_.28ARJ21-700.29)
8)

ARJ21-900
ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACAC_ARJ21#Specifications_.28ARJ21-700.29 (http://ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACAC_ARJ21#Specifications_.28ARJ21-700.29)

ARJ21F
ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACAC_ARJ21#Specifications_.28ARJ21-700.29 (http://ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACAC_ARJ21#Specifications_.28ARJ21-700.29)

ARJ21B
ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACAC_ARJ21#Specifications_.28ARJ21-700.29 (http://ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACAC_ARJ21#Specifications_.28ARJ21-700.29)


Mitsibishi

MRJ90
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_MRJ#Specifications (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_MRJ#Specifications)


MC

MC21-100
http://www.jrlucariny.com/MC21JR.html (http://www.jrlucariny.com/MC21JR.html)


Tupolev

Tu-234
http://paginas.terra.com.br/lazer/fslucariny/Tu234M.htm (http://paginas.terra.com.br/lazer/fslucariny/Tu234M.htm)

Tu-334
http://lucariny.sites.uol.com.br/Tu334ru.htm]]http://lucariny.sites.uol.com.br/Tu334ru.htm (//http://)

Tu-414
http://www.jrlucariny.com/JRTU414.html (http://www.jrlucariny.com/JRTU414.html)


Dassault

Mercure
http://paginas.terra.com.br/lazer/fslucariny/RRJSuk.htm (http://paginas.terra.com.br/lazer/fslucariny/RRJSuk.htm)


Sud Aviation

Caravelle
http://paginas.terra.com.br/lazer/fslucariny/RRJSuk.htm (http://paginas.terra.com.br/lazer/fslucariny/RRJSuk.htm)


SUKHOI

SUPERJET 100
http://paginas.terra.com.br/lazer/fslucariny/RRJSuk.htm (http://paginas.terra.com.br/lazer/fslucariny/RRJSuk.htm)


Embraer
EMB-100
http://lucariny.sites.uol.com.br/EMB100CG.htm]]http://lucariny.sites.uol.com.br/EMB100CG.htm (//http://)

Embraer
EMB-120 Jet
http://www.jrlucariny.com/JRERJ120.html (http://www.jrlucariny.com/JRERJ120.html)
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: Seattle on December 31, 2007, 07:37:46 PM
Add them, (of course you must have Samis list)
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: AHToronto on December 31, 2007, 07:43:12 PM
no actually i don't :-[
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: Seattle on December 31, 2007, 11:15:47 PM
*grumbles* Let me dig it out :P
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: Sami on January 01, 2008, 02:18:12 PM
Yep, I am in the progress of gathering the plane info already, thanks. (Seattle, no need to dig any data for now, thanks :) )
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: AHToronto on January 01, 2008, 04:18:33 PM
Yah Seattle...Just kidding ;D, but seriously, what is your info Sami... you know "Your :List"... :)
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: Sami on January 01, 2008, 04:22:40 PM
hmm, list.. what list?  Don't know what he meant there?   ???


ps. by the way, MD-95 was never produced, and the B717 we already have in the database.
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: AHToronto on January 01, 2008, 04:24:07 PM
it said they were on Wikipedia, because it showed SAS Scadinavian Airlines having one when i went to "Airliners.net", and an AirTran MD-95 showed up on Google Images
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: Sami on January 02, 2008, 07:15:25 PM
Well Wiki isn't always the most reliable source.. ;)
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: AHToronto on February 13, 2008, 06:08:10 PM
true but it is the only reliable source for finding actual useful info on different things. and plus, the guy that did the info thing, actually got the info from boeing(or other companies through Boeing)when he asked his dad(who works there)to check for him. you can't argue with Boeing or any other airplane maker...
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: love_bus on February 15, 2008, 11:41:33 AM
Well, you guys seen to have forgotten the classics..

NAMC YS-11!  :laugh:  8) - Thats for sure..


Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: caribbeanboy on February 26, 2008, 02:42:41 PM
hey guys,

can you add the DHC6 twotter/twin otter

thanks!
looking forward to the game!!
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: Sami on March 07, 2008, 12:08:20 AM
A350-800,900,1000
- no reliable data yet. The plane is due to fly in 2013 or something.


C-110, C-130
- no data at all. The plane has been just authorized to offer to airlines and even the production go-ahead hasn't been made.


DC-8
- coming shortly.


MD-95
- Never produced under this name (although marketed as it for the first few years), it's B717 and has been added a long time ago.


ARJ21
- ACAC's site has new data since my last visit there, this can be added.


MRJ90
- Just has been authorized to offer to airlines, production go-ahead not made. Mitsubishi's site has some data though.


MC21
- Program not launched yet, Yak's site has some data though, have to investigate.


Tu-234
- => Tu-204-300. Have to dig this up.


Tu-334
- Has been in database already for a long time.


Tu-414
= Tu-324. Not launched. Some data on Tu's site but have to investigate.


Mercure
- Just added


Caravelle
- To be added.


SUPERJET 100
- Already added a time ago.


EMB-100
- No such design existed / was produced.


EMB-120 Jet
- No such design existed / was produced.


NAMC YS-11
- Will be added.


DHC-5/-6/-7
- Added.
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: AHToronto on March 07, 2008, 08:15:39 PM
OK Sami, thanks for the info. i will look for more planes just in case ;) ;D
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: JJP on March 19, 2008, 02:53:16 PM
Hi Sami,

I always thought it would be interesting for an airline sim to have prototype or speculative aircraft designs available based on the purchase activities of the players.  For example, in real life McDonnel Douglas simply could not compete with Boeing by the 1990's due to declining sales.  What if in the game, the players seem to like MD aircraft better than Boeing or Airbus aircraft (or equally as much)?  Would we have seen the advent of the MD-95 (instead of being reproduced as the B717) or the MD-12?  What if Boeing had gone ahead with its proposed double decker 747 (similar to A380 --a design it abandoned) because its pre-orders were so good?  I think it would be really cool to allow players to pre-order advertised/proposed aircraft and establish an early demand for the model (similar to Airbus gaining orders for the A350 before it was hardly on the drawing board!!!!).

Thanks!

JayP
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirWaySim...
Post by: Seattle on March 20, 2008, 01:28:34 AM
Quote from: JJP on March 19, 2008, 02:53:16 PM
Hi Sami,

I always thought it would be interesting for an airline sim to have prototype or speculative aircraft designs available based on the purchase activities of the players.  For example, in real life McDonnel Douglas simply could not compete with Boeing by the 1990's due to declining sales.  What if in the game, the players seem to like MD aircraft better than Boeing or Airbus aircraft (or equally as much)?  Would we have seen the advent of the MD-95 (instead of being reproduced as the B717) or the MD-12?  What if Boeing had gone ahead with its proposed double decker 747 (similar to A380 --a design it abandoned) because its pre-orders were so good?  I think it would be really cool to allow players to pre-order advertised/proposed aircraft and establish an early demand for the model (similar to Airbus gaining orders for the A350 before it was hardly on the drawing board!!!!).

Thanks!

JayP

No offense, but thats rather stupid. (dont kill me). We follow the history, we don't make it. However, looking at it from the perspective of fun... it would be interesting, maybe some planes that were firmly developed, such as the MD-95 could be added, however, nothing else.
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirwaySim...
Post by: Sami on March 20, 2008, 10:11:04 AM
Quote from: JJP on March 19, 2008, 02:53:16 PM
I always thought it would be interesting for an airline sim to have prototype or speculative aircraft designs available based on the purchase activities of the players.  For example, in real life McDonnel Douglas simply could not compete with Boeing by the 1990's due to declining sales.  What if in the game, the players seem to like MD aircraft better than Boeing or Airbus aircraft (or equally as much)?  Would we have seen the

Hmm, it would be a bit hard to model that entire manufacturer's history would change but wouldn't see it impossible to have a certain prototype to go into production if people would order it. Or other way around, it would not be launched if there are no orders. I think there was already this kind of proposal in some other thread.

Problem is though that there's quite limited data available on the prototype models that were never launched.
Title: Re: planes thought should be in AirwaySim...
Post by: JJP on March 22, 2008, 03:37:30 AM
Thanks for the reply, Sami.  :)