[ok] Took a loan exceeding the authorized limit

[Tha_Ape]

The picture says it all. Took a loan of 380 m while the max should have been 366 m.

[yearofthecactus]

My memory is very hazy, but I remember when playing the game a couple of years ago being able to on certain occasions take out a loan the size of the the secured amount + the unsecured amount. I put that down to poor wording.

[Tha_Ape]

Mmm... interesting. Well, I guess I'll check that when I can take a loan again, if it's not corrected by then.

[[SC] - King Kong]

Well done. A proper capitalist.

[Zombie Slayer]

It is secured + unsecured for the actual max loan. Done this many times.

Edit: Have to take the max loan at once. If you take a secured loan for more than the max amount of unsecured, the option to take an unsecured loan disappears.

[Tha_Ape]

It is secured + unsecured for the actual max loan. Done this many times.

Edit: Have to take the max loan at once. If you take a secured loan for more than the max amount of unsecured, the option to take an unsecured loan disappears.

In this case, as pointymccactus pointed out, there's an issue in the phrasing. It's not an "or".

@Sami: consider this report to be in the typos' section instead.

[Cardinal]

The flip side of this is that if you take the unsecured loan, it reduces the maximum secured loan amount by that number.

I'd still call this a bug. It's likely not intended to be both.

[Sami]

Yes, the calculation logic has been "secured + unsecured", so you could loan 366+123m here. But I changed the logic to 366m since it's "more correct".

[Mort]

Yes, the calculation logic has been "secured + unsecured", so you could loan 366+123m here. But I changed the logic to 366m since it's "more correct".

Oh great 

[schro]

Yes, the calculation logic has been "secured + unsecured", so you could loan 366+123m here. But I changed the logic to 366m since it's "more correct".

Wouldn't it have been more fun to change the descriptive text?