AirwaySim
Online Airline Management Simulation
Login
Username
Password
 
or login using:
 
My Account
Username:
E-mail:
Edit account
» Achievements
» Logout
Game Credits
Credit balance: 0 Cr
Buy credits
» Credit history
» Credits FAQ

Author Topic: [ok] A343X, defying payload restrictions  (Read 928 times)

landrover714

  • Former member
[ok] A343X, defying payload restrictions
« on: September 25, 2012, 01:39:38 PM »
MT7, Lineas Aereas Argentinas, SABE/AEP.
Well, this will end up hurting me but I feel certain the A343X is not capacity limited on routes where runway length should be a serious capacity restriction.  I posted a question about this is in the MT7 forum.  Basically I noticed AEP-HNL was being flown by a A343/X at what seems to be full capacity.  I've since leased a 343X just to see what I can get away with and the 343X can carry a full load while my 332s, with the shortest required runway length in that family, are seriously restricted.  The routes I've opened are AEP-AMS (EN3645/3646), AEP-CDG (EN3647/3648), AEP-YVR (EN3649/3650), AEP-FRA (EN3651/3652) - each cannot be done at full capacity with a 332 but a 343X is able to fly an unrestricted load.  Here are the two screenshots from my forum post:
« Last Edit: September 25, 2012, 02:53:56 PM by sami »

Offline Sami

  • Administrator
  • Members
  • Posts: 17245
    • AirwaySim - Are you the next Richard Branson?
Re: [ok] A343X, defying payload restrictions
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2012, 02:54:17 PM »
ok..

had "-2" in one place in code where it was supposed to read "2".  ::)


(does not affect any routes until rescheduled)

Offline schro

  • Members
  • Posts: 4561
Re: [ok] A343X, defying payload restrictions
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2012, 03:05:29 PM »
I guess Swiftus won't be finishing that 7 day schedule then....

Curse

  • Former member
Re: [ok] A343X, defying payload restrictions
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2012, 03:23:24 PM »
It's more the question why Swiftus hasn't posted this bug thread...

Airbus101

  • Former member
Re: [ok] A343X, defying payload restrictions
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2012, 03:47:55 PM »
To be honest I think South America has some more, I always thought it was a function of seating and Engines too so I never said anything
about A/C flying on restricted runways.  

However I believe my Airline has some of these in MT7 in South America.

*for the record I thought it was not an error, and working by design due to the fact I changed seating and have best engines. I figured it was just a close rounding math item that my better A/C could fly it.*


I will try to find these Airports in my system and post them.
Airbus101
« Last Edit: September 25, 2012, 03:50:40 PM by Airbus101 »

Online swiftus27

  • Members
  • Posts: 4435
Re: [ok] A343X, defying payload restrictions
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2012, 10:39:08 AM »
It's more the question why Swiftus hasn't posted this bug thread...

It's because I specifically made code for my browser to specifically cheat the system.  Drat, you discovered my plan. 

Sound familiar?

Curse

  • Former member
Re: [ok] A343X, defying payload restrictions
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2012, 10:53:15 AM »
Nah, you're not clever enough for that.

You simply used a bug that gave you enormours advantages and didn't report it.


Wasn't there some kind of big announcement by Elite Alliance to kick players who use bugs and cheat? Ok, you guys didn't kick the other cheaters and buguser, too, but it's still funny to refer to.

Online swiftus27

  • Members
  • Posts: 4435
Re: [ok] A343X, defying payload restrictions
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2012, 10:58:24 AM »
Nah, you're not clever enough for that.

You simply used a bug that gave you enormours advantages and didn't report it.


Wasn't there some kind of big announcement by Elite Alliance to kick players who use bugs and cheat? Ok, you guys didn't kick the other cheaters and buguser, too, but it's still funny to refer to.


... still trolling...   4 flights per week to at 50% LFs...  That's an "enormours" advantage... seriously.  I don't know how my airline would've made it.

Curse

  • Former member
Re: [ok] A343X, defying payload restrictions
« Reply #8 on: September 26, 2012, 11:18:34 AM »
Yeah, neither stay to your fault nor pardon for it.

Unfortunately that's exactly what I expected from you.


I'm sure you are extremely successful in your real life, John, with debase everybody trolling who doesn't act like you'd love to as well as deny own faults and remorse.



Online swiftus27

  • Members
  • Posts: 4435
Re: [ok] A343X, defying payload restrictions
« Reply #9 on: September 26, 2012, 11:29:25 AM »
Yeah, neither stay to your fault nor pardon for it.

Unfortunately that's exactly what I expected from you.


I'm sure you are extremely successful in your real life, John, with debase everybody trolling who doesn't act like you'd love to as well as deny own faults and remorse.




Now I just don't understand you...

Listen Troll,

I get pink warning boxes on most LH flights because I fly that fleet group.  I simply don't pay attention to them much.  I accidentally put a 763 non er on a 5400nm flight and filled 90 seats....  These things happen.   You decry that there was actual intent to deceive or cheat the system.  Again tell me how this happens and compares to people cheating the used a/c system to their benefit (by the way, these planes are already reassigned to New Delhi).   To compare this to outright cheating by using browser-addons is hilarious.  That's like putting Jay Walking and Murder in the same category.

You continue to come in here and intentionally try to start trouble.  People will see you for exactly who you are.

Your attacks are again personal in nature.  I ask for you to please leave that outside this forum.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2012, 11:41:06 AM by swiftus27 »

Curse

  • Former member
Re: [ok] A343X, defying payload restrictions
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2012, 12:23:26 PM »
Yeah, let's stop this.

There is no way you ever realize what you've done wrong.


Oh, and by the way. I never got banned or penalized for some kind of browser addon usage.

 

WARNING! This website is not compatible with the old version of Internet Explorer you are using.

If you are using the latest version please turn OFF the compatibility mode.