(comments) AirwaySim v.1.3 news, previews & info

[meiru]

No, but if you have one, then pls point me to it so I can mark it as "done" and close it.
edit: found it actually already..

Yup, me too and you already closed it months ago... with a [-] ...  ... nothing against you, but it shows, that my ideas normally aren't that bad 

[Sami]

ahem?

https://www.airwaysim.com/forum/index.php/topic,16244.0.html
https://www.airwaysim.com/forum/index.php/topic,50214.0.html

(yours is duplicate btw.)

[meiru]

ok, that was half of it... but this one is the list idea 

https://www.airwaysim.com/forum/index.php/topic,51607.msg293558.html#msg293558

[spiff23]

Sorry if this is somewhere else.. But since this is about the new features.  Looking forward to the noise restriction element.  Does this mean we'll get the long awaited  ability to turn our DC-8 sixties to seventies...with the "mythical" improved fuel consumption?   Or will we just be getting the ability to hush kit the sixties with their current engines? 

PS I like the aircraft listing page features.

[Monica]

"In summary. Flying a "Chapter 3" or "Chapter 4" noise certified aircraft does not give you any restrictions anywhere in the world ever. Chapter 2 planes (such as DC-9 and B737-200) can be flown safely globally until year 2000, which after regulations start to kick in slowly - but most of these can be hushkitted to Chapter 3."

Does this mean the BAC One-Eleven can be hushkitted to chapter 3, and continued to operate until the end of game worlds? Because I think something is off with their stats since they're still viable in the 2010s... brand new. 

[Zombie Slayer]

I like the twitter feed, but a text message alert wold be even better!

[Hillians]

is it just me or do other people also find the new interface change on the route scheduling page a real pain when scheduling 7-day routes.
The multiple pages is a real real pain and something we could do without..

[[ATA] Sunbao]

Yeah its a very bad change when doing 7 days specially when not having all planes yet.

[[SC] - King Kong]

Fully agree,

If you take out the pages thing can you make something that makes 6 similar routes for me so i dont have to that 7 times?
Thanks

[wildavidson]

+1 to these comments re scheduling page

[Elladan]

Could we perhaps have an option in the settings to turn this on or off? There are cases when it would be useful - on slower systems for example, but there are also cases when this is a pain as mentioned above.

[Zombie Slayer]

is it just me or do other people also find the new interface change on the route scheduling page a real pain when scheduling 7-day routes.
The multiple pages is a real real pain and something we could do without..

Yes, its terrible. When swapping planes, all available planes are not listed either. It cuts it off at about 7 frames.

This is a HUGE step backwards and need to revert back to the old style ASAP.....

[Aoitsuki]

is it just me or do other people also find the new interface change on the route scheduling page a real pain when scheduling 7-day routes.
The multiple pages is a real real pain and something we could do without..

worse part of the multiple page is let's say you want to select a route in page 1... page 2... page 3... etc.... for each page you select you will need to apply first, let the change apply, reload all the graphics, find your aircraft and select teh route on the next page.

[[SC] - King Kong]

PLEASE CHANGE I'M f***ing crying here

[schro]

So, the cure for my bug report seems to be worse than the disease. We need to revert and abort, and find a better way to handle it.

[JumboShrimp]

Pagination feature of "Move Schedule", where potential aircraft to move the schedule to seems to be more hassle than benefit.

If there is anything that would be useful here is to have a filter to aircraft types within the fleet.  For example, when moving schedule within 737 classic fleet, ability to select, say "734-400" aircraft only would be useful.