I am grateful for your change in the ESGB runway length after my remarks, but now I have to be a "pain in your ass" again !
I have tried, God knows, how many times with an airline at my dear home airport ESGB- Gothenburg, Sweden's no 2 largest city.
I know my aviation history well and did my first flying education to commercial pilot there in 1977.
After all failures and bankrupcies, I am getting pretty annoyed with the "degradation" you have set for ESGB. Here, I have about 25 px/day at any destination, except London (86).
Checking official statistics, ESGB had in 1975 about 1,130,000 passengers which is about 3,000/day!
Stockholm had at the same time 4,300,000 px which is about 11,800px/day. A factor 4x compared to Gothenburg.
When we look into Airwaysim, Stockholm has 650 px/day to Paris LFPG. Gothenburg has 30 px/day! a factor 22x!
Helsinki has 476 px/day to LFPG!
and so on..
Where is the balance and logic in this??
Do you want all airlines to be based in the countries capital cities?
I just want to know why you have degraded ESGB to such a minor airport?
We are in the beginning of the Jet Age 1975 , but who can start a business with a 24 px jet ?
I guess I have to give up Gothenburg as a base airport which is a shame historically I think.
Hope you can fix the imbalance,