As I said we focus on our community. This means keeping our members together and offering them a presence in all game worlds. We certainly won't limit ourselves to one single game world just to win that.
Yes, you can still focus on community, have a great time with friends and acquaintances, why worry about the results?
As I said, the number of 25 airlines is completely arbitrary and there is absolutely no sensible reason why there should be more importance on that than on the quality of airlines in an alliance. An alliance with 3 top airlines should not win against an alliance with 3 top airlines and 22 mediocre ones, but the way we are losing against an alliance with 60% of our quality (as in variable score) just because said alliance has maintained that arbitrary number for a bit longer than we have is absolutely ridiculous.
Sorry to say, but is that how you define "quality"? Top 10% in those criteria means quality? Then AA, Delta, United and the like are top quality airlines, and not the 5 star Asiana Airlines, Garuda Indonesia, Hainan Airlines, Qatar Airways, etc...
If you want score, try using the new airlines score, and see average score per airlines of each Alliance. I don't say the new airlines score is a good measure, but at least it includes everyone and have a wide judging criteria
By the way, if you bring sporting analogies already - what would you say if your favorite sports team lead the league by a vast amount but still got beaten by another team for the championship because that team had the maximum allowed number of players in the squad for longer and fewer injuries over the season? There would be one hell of an uproar if that happened.
I tell you another story. At the beginning of the season, A team who got many big stars in their squad, achieves win after win and created a big lead over B team who only has a few good players and many mediocre ones. Closing to mid season break, A team's players started to switch their attention from the league to the national cup and Europe cup. Because of playing too many games, their players were showing fatigue, lack of focus, and losing form. In addition to that, injuries kept coming. A team coach refused to recruit new players during the winter break to replace injuries, and said they could fight with 20 players, oh even 16 players, even though the rule allows 25 players in the squad
Now the league is about to end and B team manages to lead because they focus only in the league, have full 25 healthy players in the squad so they can rotate. And you think it's wrong for B team to win?
Moreover, A team is now calling to change the rule:
- 45 minutes per game, 19 rounds per season so their stars have enough stamina to finish the league soon, and can go on to cups
- Only 15 players maximum in the squad
- 1 on 1 game, so star players can win the game on their own. No more team work, coz they don't want to work with new recruited players, and junior players will only screw the game